6.4 Key Institutional Issues

6.4.1 Building Capacity

Large scale EI sector developments can involve very large investments relative to many small economies, and can require much more technical expertise than other sectors in the economy. They can involve very experienced and serious international investors on one hand, and speculators seeking to take advantage of a state’s resources on the other.

 

Savvy investors can put government officials at a disadvantage when negotiating private participation in a state’s EI sector.[14]  It therefore may be necessary to adjust employment and other policies so that the EI sector agencies can attract and retain competent, non-corrupt, well-qualified, and experienced professional staff in sufficient numbers to administer the EI sector effectively so as to adequately represent the state interest.  It may also be necessary to ensure that the EI sector ministries and agencies, and their counterparts in the tax and finance ministries, have adequate budgets and technical capacity given the high financial stakes involved for a state with large-scale EI sector operations.

 

Resource-rich developing states, where institutional capacity is weak, can seek support by directly engaging external expertise or benefiting from donor or IFI technical assistance programs. External assistance can be doubly valuable in providing essential training while at the same time addressing current issues on behalf of the state. Good practice would call for this assistance to be discussed and carefully planned with the expected beneficiaries. The petroleum sector technical assistance program designed jointly by the Government of Southern Sudan, the World Bank, and Norway provides an excellent example of good practice (see Box 6.7 above).

 

6.4.2 Inter-Agency Coordination

Perhaps the biggest issue related to the development of appropriate institutional capacity relates to inter-agency coordination. Several different governmental entities engage with EI sector investors. The key government agencies include: (1) the EI sector ministry or government department on exploration and production; (2) the ministry responsible for geological data; (3) the ministry responsible for the environment; (4) the ministry responsible for local community and social issues; (5) the finance ministry; (6) the ministry or administration responsible for taxation; (7) the ministry responsible for economic planning; and (8) the ministry or ministries responsible for rural and small business development.


As noted below in the discussion of fiscal administration (Chapter 7), all too often the expertise regarding EI sector exploration and operation is only to be found in the EI sector ministry. If this expertise is not made available to or if it is not accepted by other arms of government, it can result in those other agencies being seriously disadvantaged in their engagement on EI sector issues.

It is not unusual to find a situation in which some ministries or agencies are actively encouraging new investment while at the same time others are creating barriers. This can obviously create additional risks for investors and fewer benefits for government. As a practical matter, this can cause problems relating to issuing visas and work permits, and in providing customs clearances and releases for goods and equipment. Thus, there is great value in developing well-organized and coordinated EI sector knowledge sharing and information flows. In particular, it is important that the EI sector ministry coordinates well with other government departments in order to achieve effective oversight, regulation, and risk sharing between government and investors.[15] 




Learning Modules & Training
Comments
  • daniel gilbert: South Sudan, referenced on this page, is also an area of focus of Dr Salman Salman, ex-World Bank, and an 'Hon Associate' of the UNESCO Water Centre, a sister department of CEPMLP. See http://www.dundee.ac.uk/water/people/honoraries/salmansalman/… read more