7. Fiscal Design and Administration
- 5.1 Policy Context
- 5.2 Sector Legislation: Design
- 5.3 Sector Legislation: Content
- 5.4 Contracts and Licenses
- 5.5 Local Content
- 5.6 The Award of Contracts and Licenses
- 5.7 Regulations
- 5.8 Contract Negotiations and Dispute Settlement
- 6.1 Institutional Structures
- 6.2 An Overview of the Key Governmental Bodies and Agencies
- 6.3 Focus on a Key Player: National Resource Companies
- 6.4 Key Institutional Issues
- 6.5 Efforts at Institutional Reform
- 7.1 Fiscal Objectives
- 7.2 Fiscal Instruments
- 7.3 Special Fiscal Topics and Provisions
- 7.4 Fiscal Packages
- 7.5 Fiscal Administration
- 8.1 Consumption
- 8.2 Investment
- 8.3 Spending Channels
- 8.4 Volatility Concerns
- 8.5 Absorptive Capacity
- 8.6 Debt Reduction
- 8.7 Resource Funds
- 8.8 Fiscal Discipline and Sustainability
- 8.9 Revenue Allocation
- 9.1 The Approach in the Source Book
- 9.2 What are the Challenges?
- 9.3 Investment
- 9.4 Expenditure Quality Control and Oversight
- 9.5 Objectives
- 9.6 Challenges and Special Issues
- 9.7 General Principles for Response
- 9.8 Policy Instruments
- 9.9 Management and Oversight
- 9.10 Stakeholder Consultation and Participation
- 9.11 Conclusions
The effectiveness of an EI sector fiscal regime depends on the objectives established for that regime, on the fiscal instruments selected to achieve those objectives, and on the quality of fiscal administration. Both the design and implementation of EI sector fiscal regimes are complex, requiring appropriate expertise.
While all links in the EI value chain are critical to overall success in the management of the EI sectors, the applicable fiscal regime attracts perhaps more attention than most. The effectiveness of any EI fiscal regime depends on three factors: (1) its objectives; (2) the fiscal instruments it comprises; and (3) its practical administration. Governments provide mineral and hydrocarbon rights to private sector companies with the expectation that the nation will subsequently benefit from tax payments which can then be used for social services and economic growth (i.e., converting a resource in the ground into both social and economic capital).[1] Correspondingly, private companies invest with the expectation of making a profit commensurate with the risks involved and their cost of capital. For both parties there are potential risks and rewards and the balancing of those risks and rewards will ultimately determine what oil, gas and mining development takes place and how beneficial it is to the government, the investor and the local community.[2] The fiscal regime is a key determinant of how oil, gas and mining income is shared between the investor and the government.
Additional Reading:
- Otto, J., Fiscal Decentralization and Mining Taxation, (The World Bank Group Mining Department March 2001); link to summary document; and
- Tordo, S., Fiscal systems for hydrocarbons: design issues (Washington D.C., USA: World Bank, 2007); link to summary document.
- roberto agostini: In terms of extractive industries the basic rules of good fiscal practice and economics should apply as much as to any other sector. The fact is that annually balanced budgets tend to foster instability. So, instead and off the back of strong… read more






Copyright © 2010 EI Source Book. All rights reserved. 

